Jump to content
  • 0

Missed 2nd base, following runner was called out


Guest Rtw
Umpire-Empire locks topics which have not been active in the last year. The thread you are viewing hasn't been active in 1753 days so you will not be able to post. We do recommend you starting a new topic to find out what's new in the world of umpiring.

Question

7-8u Pinto league baseball.  Runners on 1st and 2nd.  Batter hits in the park homerun.  Runner on 1st base doesn't touch 2nd, scores and goes to dugout.  When the batter touches home, ump in outfield says that the runner on 1st had missed 2nd base and is out, then the homeplate umpire calls the batter out because he says since the runner missed 2nd that made the batter pass that runner.  Was this the correct call to call the batter out?  Can someone direct me to a rule that states the correct call?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

umpire should not have made the out call at second without the defense properly appealing that R1 missed second.

 

the batter/runner should not have been called out, he did not physically pass the runner.

 

What rule set are the games played under??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

How would the umpires learn anything unless the manager Protested?

Unless the manager Protested then two wrong calls stand as-is and the umpires will continue to make the wrong calls.  Protests are a learning experience!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
11 minutes ago, Lou B said:

How would the umpires learn anything unless the manager Protested?

Unless the manager Protested then two wrong calls stand as-is and the umpires will continue to make the wrong calls.  Protests are a learning experience!

Sometimes, even without a protest,. there is a discussion -- and the good umpires (or those who become good umpires) will look it up after the game, or talk to more-experienced umpires, etc.

A protest is not the only way to learn something.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

The Protest process starts with an "Appeal", give the umps a chance to talk it over. If they reverse the calls (get it right) there is no Protest.  If they stick with the incorrect call(s) then you Protest.  Hopefully they learn the correct rule/ruling from the Protest Committee/hearing.

If you say/do nothing the umpires believe their calls are correct, even when they're not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
1 hour ago, Guest Rtw said:

Can someone direct me to a rule that states the correct call?

Actually, you have it backwards.  The umpires should be required to point to a rule that says this is an out.

There is no rule that says what the umpire claims...and conversely, there is no rule that specifically says it is not.

You are out for physically passing a runner (ie. if the following runner somehow ends up beyond the preceding runner, the following runner is out)....in this case, even though the first runner never legally touched second base, the following runner never actually, physically, truly, technically passed the runner.    It only occurred virtually, and within the umpire's imagination.

 

There is no rule that says  "even if a preceding runner misses a base a following runner is not out for passing the missed base."

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

When I was a PONY League President it was:

Shetland: 5-6

Pinto: 7-8

Mustang: 9-10

Bronco: 11-12

Pony: 13-14

Colt: 15-16

Palomino: 17-18

Different field sizes for each of the younger age groups (till you get to 60'6"/90').

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Pinto should be PONY, but PONY has never been aggressive on defending their trademarks.  I’ve found most organizations using PONY league names (around here) have rarely maintained their official affiliation.  Most of them are just independents using the names.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
On 6/13/2019 at 6:33 AM, Guest Rtw said:

7-8u Pinto league baseball.  Runners on 1st and 2nd.  Batter hits in the park homerun.  Runner on 1st base doesn't touch 2nd, scores and goes to dugout.  When the batter touches home, ump in outfield says that the runner on 1st had missed 2nd base and is out, then the homeplate umpire calls the batter out because he says since the runner missed 2nd that made the batter pass that runner.  Was this the correct call to call the batter out?  Can someone direct me to a rule that states the correct call?

No. R1 is out if the defense appeals at second; either way, the batter did not pass him. If he was out at second, he is removed from the play and cannot be passed, and if he wasn’t, then—I assume the batter didn’t physically run in front of R1?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...