Jump to content

One Player, Two BAD Calls


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 29
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Clearly it was his own kid.

13u game and a coach didn't question his runner not beating the throw? Maybe it wasn't as clear as you thought. As for the strike zone, I've always told my 13 year old, that it's very important t

Don't even entertain the conversation. After his first comment, you need to shut it down--do not respond in any way that addresses the comment and make it clear that there is no discussing it.

On 6/17/2019 at 5:16 PM, Thatsnotyou said:

On the same topic here...what's a good reply to "he's making you look bad!" Just silence, I guess? Try to keep your integrity, even if your partner sucks? You have to have his back, sure, but sometimes you know your partner is just bad (starting with appearance), and you have to officiate as well as you can just to make up for it and hope they notice your effort and accuracy.  It's uncomfortable all around.

Yes, certainly uncomfortable, but like any other job or profession, when "they" (whoever they are) try to divide and conquer, or at least gather ammunition to shoot the other guy up with, you are now put in the middle of the sh***, so "embrace the suck" : "You know what, coach, just rank me the same as him, because I don't think he is all that bad, and you're putting me in a bad situation here"

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, BobUmp said:

Yes, certainly uncomfortable, but like any other job or profession, when "they" (whoever they are) try to divide and conquer, or at least gather ammunition to shoot the other guy up with, you are now put in the middle of the sh***, so "embrace the suck" : "You know what, coach, just rank me the same as him, because I don't think he is all that bad, and you're putting me in a bad situation here"

I'd like to not invite a torpedo of my ranking. I get having his back, obviously, I just don't know if I'd say that. I'd probably still play the silent card, unless we need to move to warn/eject.

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/13/2019 at 12:24 PM, The Short Umpire said:

1. I completely agree. I probably didn't give quite as context as I could have, but I'm always open to being wrong, especially because from behind the plate I don't have the correct angle to really see that play. 

2. I also agree. He had a great game and I don't question him, or his integrity. I've done lots of games with him and have known him for years.

What I was really trying to say was that it was a weird coincidence that the only calls I would have called the opposite way were against the same kid. That being said some people would take that situation and possibly have doubts which got me to the hypothetical "what if I truly deep down suspected my partner of doing something like this?" I wasn't trying to accuse my partner, just kind of a day dream, but I should have chosen my words differently as to not give that impression.

Would not even entertain these thoughts. $h!t happens. Almost sounds like both calls could be attributed to making a call too quickly.  

Like any "off" game (yours or a partner's), review it, learn from it and try not to make the same mistakes. 

After that, let it go.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/12/2019 at 11:30 PM, The Short Umpire said:

Now I'm not accusing my partner of anything, but I found it interesting that the same kid got the short stick twice in the same night.

This is something you should never find interesting, and unfortunately, because some people do find it interesting is why some people - those who don't understand statistics and variance and deviation, etc - decide that the ump is, umm, not showing optimal integrity.

On 6/12/2019 at 11:30 PM, The Short Umpire said:

But I was curious if any of you ever had a game where you really wondered if you partner wasn't calling the game straight up

I want to see a pattern over dozens of calls, if not hundreds...and not the obvious ones because, (unless REALLY bold) even a full-blown cheat isn't going to make it obvious.  I want to see dozens of close calls that all go towards one team or one player before I even start thinking that something is up.

Even in rec league games where the home team provides a parent volunteer umpire, when you would expect that some close calls would favor the home team (unconsciously, not intentionally) you don't see that type of pattern.

Unless the cheater is a real idiot you should never be able to determine he's cheating in the course of one or two games.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...