Jump to content

Insurance null and void IF?


BigUmpire
Umpire-Empire locks topics which have not been active in the last year. The thread you are viewing hasn't been active in 2230 days so you will not be able to post. We do recommend you starting a new topic to find out what's new in the world of umpiring.

Recommended Posts

If an umpire calls a game where there :

1.    Less than the required number of players to field a team

2.   Game where pick-up players and/or borrowed are used

3.   A  pick-up game

4.   A practice game

Is the umpire:

1.    More liable for injuries suffered during any of the above games?

2.    Not insured at all.

We have some umpires claiming that their insurance is void IF the call any “non sanctioned” games/event

I carry NASO and ABUA insurance and cannot find any exclusions in either policy BUT did not read all fine print

 

Comments please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, BigUmpire said:

If an umpire calls a game where there :

1.    Less than the required number of players to field a team

2.   Game where pick-up players and/or borrowed are used

3.   A  pick-up game

4.   A practice game

Is the umpire:

1.    More liable for injuries suffered during any of the above games?

2.    Not insured at all.

We have some umpires claiming that their insurance is void IF the call any “non sanctioned” games/event

I carry NASO and ABUA insurance and cannot find any exclusions in either policy BUT did not read all fine print

 

Comments please

NASO used to cover more than some of the other insurances.  For example, 1 and 4 above would be covered (iirc, of course).

 

I do agree that the best course would be ot read the policies and / or to talk to the companies involved, rather than asking us mopes for our unenlightened opinions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A few years ago when I was still a lawyer, I looked into this casually as a follow-up to a discussion my association had about not continuing to officiate after the game ended on a runs-ahead rule.  I tracked down the actual policy, which said something like it covered all umpiring activity, with no express exclusion for any "not-a-real-game" umpiring.  My opinion thus was that the policy did cover any umpiring activity, even "not-a-real-game" umpiring. Also, I believe courts construe ambiguous language, especially in insurance policies, against the drafter (i.e., the insurance company), strengthening my opinion.  But don't quote me.  

I also knew that my state supreme court had some years earlier spelled out a strong assumption-of-the-risk rule for participants in any sports activity, so I felt doubly protected from liability.  (If I recall correctly, the case was a gung-ho jerk in a Super Bowl party halftime touch football game caused grievous bodily injury to a non-athletic woman; held: he was not liable because she assumed the risk of all injury by participating in the game).  Your state's mileage may differ.  In fact, I believe that at least in my state, umpire insurance premiums are essentially donations to the insurance company, except for paying for a defense lawyer and for a satisfying superfluous sense of security.  Of course, I'm a cynic.

Disclaimer: Insurance coverage was never my specialty, I relied only on superficial research and law school knowledge, and I am no longer a lawyer.  But I still believe my opinion is correct.  I would like to hear of any final trial verdicts (not settlements) holding umpires liable for any umpiring activity.  Preferably with citations to an official source, and not to friends of cousins.

But it is a foolproof way of declining to continue to umpire games that are going to come unglued because the participants no longer consider them for real.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

On a similar note, wlll insurance cover me if I work as an "extra" umpire for no pay (e.g. as a 3rd umpire on a game with 2 paid umpires)? I am a NASO member, and I would like to get 3-man experience, but there aren't many leagues that do use 3 umpires for games, at least not on a paid basis. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ilyazhito said:

On a similar note, wlll insurance cover me if I work as an "extra" umpire for no pay (e.g. as a 3rd umpire on a game with 2 paid umpires)? I am a NASO member, and I would like to get 3-man experience, but there aren't many leagues that do use 3 umpires for games, at least not on a paid basis. 

Maybe call or email NASO directly. Here in Washington state, we will do this at the end of the High School season as we are covered under the state insurance. However, since we are now fully covered, state wide, by NASO... I wonder if that is still the case?

(SIDE NOTE: I also have worked in Oregon, and they do not allow you to work 3 man unless the game is assigned as such.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...