<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>All Activity</title><link>https://umpire-empire.com/discover/</link><description>Umpire-Empire - All Activity</description><language>en</language><item><title>Balls and strikes</title><link><![CDATA[https://umpire-empire.com/topic/83904-balls-and-strikes/?do=findComment&comment=453088]]></link><description>Does show where the pitched ball crosses strike zone at the middle of the plate. Which is why pitched balls that cross the strike zone at the front of the plate can be correct strikes for the ump but overturned on ABS. And the rare 12 to 6 curve that catches the back point of the plate can be a ball by ABS but a correct strike by the ump. That being said ABS is an improvement and correcting some gross misses.</description><pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 04:17:10 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Balls and strikes</title><link><![CDATA[https://umpire-empire.com/topic/83904-balls-and-strikes/?do=findComment&comment=453087]]></link><description><![CDATA[I can't quite make sense of what you're asking, considering that the ABS Challenge system does show – and is, in fact, based on – where the pitched ball crosses the plate. Completely irrespective of where or how the catcher caught it (or, "where the ball lands"). 
 


	While I respect @BigBlue4u's perspective, for the discernment (calling) of Balls &amp; Strikes, Baseball is disconnecting the factual, measured path of the ball through the strike zone from the "how" – the catching / framing / presentation by the catcher (F2).]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 00:47:21 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>what message (code or whatever) was being sent here</title><link><![CDATA[https://umpire-empire.com/topic/83909-what-message-code-or-whatever-was-being-sent-here/?do=findComment&comment=453086]]></link><description>Just asking
 


	Cincinnati down 17-0 asking for a pitch challenge in the 8th. is it being asked because u think HPU has had a lousy night when the team is still down 17-0 and you want to make him have to stay longer and send him a coded message without having to say a word, or is this a, i paid my dues in the minors, i will ask for a challenge whenever i want to. just like money ball and that 13-0 comeback that almost happened. could he not have just swung the bat at that pitch. maybe he would have got a hit since it was a strike, and he would not have had an o fer 4 night.
 


	kind of like little tommy and i paid my money, i will ask my questions. if the batter hits a ball to the moon and it bounces off the moon and lands in fair territory, is it a ground rule double or a home run or keep on playing as if it did did not hit the moon. but what if it hits a bird on the way to, or way back from the moon, or its hits the bird both on the way to and on the way back, what then. but i paid my dues, i will ask my questions.</description><pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 15:51:02 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Balls and strikes</title><link><![CDATA[https://umpire-empire.com/topic/83904-balls-and-strikes/?do=findComment&comment=453084]]></link><description>There is also a real-life consideration that needs to be made.  Right or wrong, the way a catcher catches a borderline pitch can be a major factor in calling a pitch a strike.  If a pitch comes in at the batter's knees, and the catcher stops the pitch at ground level, by rule that's a strike.  However, that probably won't be acceptable to the players.  A good catcher will extend his glove as far as possible and likely be rewarded with a strike call.  Current LA Angels manager Curt Suzuki was a master at this while catching at Cal State Fullerton. On corner pitches, he would roll his glove into the zone and get a lot of strikes just by not jerking his glove into the strike zone.</description><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 21:48:03 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>SSK ball bags</title><link><![CDATA[https://umpire-empire.com/topic/83907-ssk-ball-bags/?do=findComment&comment=453083]]></link><description>@Thunderheads ... sold, lock it up, please!</description><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 20:43:14 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>SSK ball bags</title><link><![CDATA[https://umpire-empire.com/topic/83907-ssk-ball-bags/?do=findComment&comment=453082]]></link><description>@Thunderheads ... sold, lock it up, please!</description><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 20:39:26 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>MLB Ejection 115 - Doug Eddings (4; Oliver Marmol)</title><link><![CDATA[https://umpire-empire.com/topic/83900-mlb-ejection-115-doug-eddings-4-oliver-marmol/?do=findComment&comment=453081]]></link><description>and you had the call mentioned in this article below in the LCS in 2005 and then no playoffs again whatsoever until a one game wild card in left field in 2014 then until a DS in 2018.
 


	so lets be fair. where are all those videos and articles, especially videos of professional umpires of amateur players from college on down that are less than as umpires so we can compare and talk about them.
 


	https://www.ocregister.com/2005/10/13/eddings-blown-call-a-stinker/</description><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 09:33:33 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>MLB Ejection 115 - Doug Eddings (4; Oliver Marmol)</title><link><![CDATA[https://umpire-empire.com/topic/83900-mlb-ejection-115-doug-eddings-4-oliver-marmol/?do=findComment&comment=453080]]></link><description>Just some video to calm you down and keep that aneurism from bursting:</description><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 03:28:02 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>MLB Ejection 115 - Doug Eddings (4; Oliver Marmol)</title><link><![CDATA[https://umpire-empire.com/topic/83900-mlb-ejection-115-doug-eddings-4-oliver-marmol/?do=findComment&comment=453079]]></link><description>my guess is that the comeuppance u might be seeking will be in the form of no playoff assignments whatsoever, which will end the streak of having a DS, or LCS, or WS every year since 2018.
 


	seems like that was the punishment for another pitcher incident in the past in May of 2022 which was a lot earlier in the year when that happen.
 


	I would imagine MLB does not want this situation and negative publicity, especially happening only a month before post season, to possibly be on the tip of every announcers tongue to mention and talk about, before the start of every game of a post season assignment if they were to be chosen for a playoff assignment.
 


	now an umpire/former sheriff tackling a streaker in April for running on the field, would be an entirely different situation for not wanting to possibly take the fans minds off the coming post season.</description><pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 22:41:13 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>SSK ball bags</title><link><![CDATA[https://umpire-empire.com/topic/83907-ssk-ball-bags/?do=findComment&comment=453078]]></link><description>Looking to sell these pair of SSK ball bags
 


	Asking for $80 + shipping 
 


	Thank you!
 

IMG_4497.HEIC 
IMG_4498.HEIC</description><pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 15:48:13 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Balls and strikes</title><link><![CDATA[https://umpire-empire.com/topic/83904-balls-and-strikes/?do=findComment&comment=453077]]></link><description>This is not true.
 


	ABS and/or that real time box you see are both measuring where the ball crosses the plate - not where it "lands"....ie. the catcher's mitt??
 


	The difference is ABS uses one specific point of the plate, so it's a 2D plane, whereas the actual rulebook defines the strike zone as a 3D area in space the shape of the plate.
 


	I suspect ABS will improve this over time.</description><pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 14:38:40 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Umpires in the VT/NH/ME Area</title><link><![CDATA[https://umpire-empire.com/topic/83906-umpires-in-the-vtnhme-area/?do=findComment&comment=453076]]></link><description>Hi all, 
 


	I'm picking umpiring back up here in New England, and I'm looking to meet and work with umpires in Vermont, New Hampshire, Maine. 
 


	Thanks, 
 


	SJD.</description><pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 14:12:23 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Balls and strikes</title><link><![CDATA[https://umpire-empire.com/topic/83904-balls-and-strikes/?do=findComment&comment=453075]]></link><description>By rule, pitches are judged as the cross the plate... any portion of the plate. When you see ABS challeneges, the pitches are read at the mid point of the plate, i.e. where the plate starts to taper into the point.</description><pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 12:33:23 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Balls and strikes</title><link><![CDATA[https://umpire-empire.com/topic/83904-balls-and-strikes/?do=findComment&comment=453073]]></link><description>When is a ball considered a strike? Where crosses the plate, where the ball lands. I say where crosses the plate. Now that is how it is how come when we watch it on TV and they challenge it they only show you where the ball lands why don't they show you where crosses the plate? Please give it informed answer for what is a strike please</description><pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 01:32:06 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>WPBL Ejection - Hawkins/Perez for...What Exactly?</title><link><![CDATA[https://umpire-empire.com/topic/83903-wpbl-ejection-hawkinsperez-forwhat-exactly/?do=findComment&comment=453072]]></link><description>Valerie Perez made history as the first player ejection in WPBL history as umpire Cody Hawkins ejected the New York Heights SS after an interference call on teammate Keira Izumi vs San Francisco. With one out and the bases loaded in a 12-0 game with New York leading, Heights batter Claire Eccles hit a ground ball toward second base, where it hit baserunner R1 Izumi's foot before reaching Fireballs 2B Amanda Gianelloni, ruled interference by field umpire Hawkins. Upon consultation, umpires declared R1 Izumi out and ordered baserunner R2 Perez back to second base, R3 Studer back to third base, and awarded batter-runner Eccles first base on the fielder's choice/interference play. Hawkins subsequently ejected Perez, who hesitated before ultimately returning to second base while speaking with the umpire.  At the time of the ejection, the Heights were leading, 12-0. The Heights ultimately won the contest, 14-2. 

 
Wrap: San Francisco Firebells vs New York Heights (WPBL), 9/4/26 | Video as follows: Alternate Link: 1st player ejection in Women's Professional Baseball League history is... for what?View the full article</description><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 23:25:30 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Items for Sale</title><link><![CDATA[https://umpire-empire.com/topic/83902-items-for-sale/?do=findComment&comment=453071]]></link><description>How much is the Honig&#x2019;s jacket?</description><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 23:20:51 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Items for Sale</title><link><![CDATA[https://umpire-empire.com/topic/83902-items-for-sale/?do=findComment&comment=453070]]></link><description>Need to clear closet. Items include shipping. Willing to take offers and negotiate. Need to get rid of these items ASAP! Paypal, Cashapp and Venmo accepted.
 


	1. Custom Retrofitted Wilson Gold. The padding is a medium size Riddell Power planform. Plates are a original Wilson Gold small plates. Has Wilson neoprene harness and fidlock magnetic buckles. Very light and low profile. Retrofitted by UmpGuard. $180
 


	2. Honigs Navy Thermal Jacket. Side medium.</description><enclosure url="https://umpire-empire.com/uploads/monthly_2026_09/20260809_110329.jpg.4aa0fde22a98002d2de33bc85888786a.jpg" length="1961993" type="image/jpeg"/><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 21:13:01 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>MLB Ejection 115 - Doug Eddings (4; Oliver Marmol)</title><link><![CDATA[https://umpire-empire.com/topic/83900-mlb-ejection-115-doug-eddings-4-oliver-marmol/?do=findComment&comment=453069]]></link><description>This manager showed a restraint I would not have - I'd have gone nuclear, and likely been suspended...I'm not talking violence, but I would have violated every rule MLB has about what you can or can't say after a game to the media about the umpires...at the very least, forcing the league's hand to making a choice between doing SOMETHING about this clown they call an umpire OR publicly stating that the umpire was correct.   There is no room for an umpire calling this "my field".</description><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 18:29:48 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>FS: All Star and Force3 Protective, Mizuno Shoes, Smitty and GD shirts, Mizuno pants, etc.</title><link><![CDATA[https://umpire-empire.com/topic/83861-fs-all-star-and-force3-protective-mizuno-shoes-smitty-and-gd-shirts-mizuno-pants-etc/?do=findComment&comment=453068]]></link><description>quick beginning of short workweek/fall ball bump. Feel free to make offers before I list on Ebay and FB classifieds...</description><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 14:00:33 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>MLB Ejection 083 - James Hoye (1; Don Kelly)</title><link><![CDATA[https://umpire-empire.com/topic/83835-mlb-ejection-083-james-hoye-1-don-kelly/?do=findComment&comment=453066]]></link><description>just use full ABS like the umpires wanted for ball strike. use the new check swing technology for check swing or not. use the infrared technology to help with HBP or ball off the foot.
 


	there will be a plethora of other work at the plate. keeping the count. timing infractions or not, balks or not, catchers interference or not, fair foul or not, pitcher trapping ball hit back to them or not, runners lane violation or not, safe out at the plate or not, placement of runners, etc. When ABS goes down with a tech problem, then the umpires can call the rest of the game ball/strike like they do now.
 


	and did the SEC use the ball strike technology that we know they have, and we know they have it, to pick the best umpires ball/strike wise to call the SEC tournament. other than just go by the misses, even if un-challeged, you could tighten up the zone on who/whom you pick for the tournament by taking the distance missed on each miss ball or strike, and divide it by the total number of pitches called to get the best umpires that have the least amount of distanced missed by (DMB) and chose them to work the tournament and be the leader in this area.</description><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 10:52:34 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>MLB Ejection 083 - James Hoye (1; Don Kelly)</title><link><![CDATA[https://umpire-empire.com/topic/83835-mlb-ejection-083-james-hoye-1-don-kelly/?do=findComment&comment=453065]]></link><description><![CDATA[When this occurred, I actually contacted @Velho with glee, since this is (er, was) an example of one of the gilded windmills with which I personally tilt. 
 


	It's the crink in my craw, the pea under my mattress, the bug in my boo. 
 


	My white whale is the utterly worthless, ambiguous, vapid emphasis placed on "timing" (as it relates to calling balls &amp; strikes specifically), and its contrived insinuation as a currency, or merit badge, or compulsory check-box on an evaluation form... so as to judge (appraise, or "evaluate") proficiency, and ultimately to determine "who is better than who". 
 


	🐴 💩.
 


	Why aren't we appraising or evaluating based on call accuracy? What is this pedantic obsession with "timing"?  
	I will argue and advocate that it's this obsession with "timing" – and, more poignantly, how it is linked to or affects the "challenge immediately" aspect of The Rule – that is causing the problem. Because U#92 took "so long" to call it a strike, F2 (Contreras) is the one that made the challenge signal, not (initially) Batter (Gonzalez). Of course, U#92 had it as a strike, and the logical conclusion is that, had Contreras known that it was a strike, he wouldn't rationally challenge it! So, thus, there isn't a challenge to grant... logically. Of course, if it truly is called a strike (which it was), after all those "stutters", then the Batter should be allowed to make a forthright challenge. Now, Kelly could be arguing that his Batter (Gonzalez) was denied a challenge, but I have a sinking suspicion that Kelly was arguing that, by the "letter of the law (rule)", that Contreras has to be charged a challenge! That, because he made the challenge signal, however erroneously or without (full) knowledge of the call (because U#92 was performing "timing" in his call), then the whole challenge theatrics has to be performed. 
 


	Follow the rules, ya know. 
 


	Sounds an awful lot like the NCAA adage, "Enforce it as written."
 


	So yeah, while I would say and agree that the "challenge immediately" vernacular needs more clarity or latitude, I will also state and defend – that if we get off this obsession with "timing", we might actually start to put the onus on call accuracy.]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 00:32:55 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>MLB Ejection 116 - Jeremie Rehak (3; Tony Vitello)</title><link><![CDATA[https://umpire-empire.com/topic/83901-mlb-ejection-116-jeremie-rehak-3-tony-vitello/?do=findComment&comment=453067]]></link><description>HP Umpire Jeremie Rehak ejected Giants manager Tony Vitello (Replay Review that upheld a foul ball/not HBP call; QOCN) in the top of the 2nd inning of the #Giants-#Mets game. With none out and none on, Giants batter Turner Hill attempted to avoid a 0-1 curveball from Mets pitcher Zac Thornton, ruled a foul ball by HP Umpire Rehak and affirmed upon Replay Review as the result of a manager's challenge by Giants manager Vitello. Replays indicate the pitched ball touched batter Hill's hand before touching the bat, the call was incorrect. At the time of the ejection, the Giants were leading, 1-0. The Giants ultimately won the contest, 9-5. This is Jeremie Rehak (35)'s 3rd ejection of 2026. This is the 116th ejection report of the 2026 MLB regular season.This is the 67th manager ejection of 2026. Ejection Tally: 67 Managers, 22 Coaches, 27 Players.This is San Francisco's 10th ejection of 2026, 1st in the NL West (SD, SF 10; ARI 1; COL, LAD 0).This is Tony Vitello's 6th ejection of 2026, 1st since August 28 (Alan Porter; QOC = U [Fair/Foul]).This is Jeremie Rehak's 3rd ejection of 2026, 1st since July 28 (Craig Stammen; QOC = N [ABS Denial]). Wrap: San Francisco Giants vs New York Mets, 9/5/26 | Video as follows: Alternate Link: Vitello ejected as Giants and Padres' ejection lead race comes down to the wireView the full article</description><pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2026 06:15:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>when were those in the know going to tell us</title><link><![CDATA[https://umpire-empire.com/topic/83873-when-were-those-in-the-know-going-to-tell-us/?do=findComment&comment=453061]]></link><description>would it not help in a scouting/supervisor situation. all the umpires at a level come to the supervisor, rather than the supervisor chasing the crews. you could see 45 guys in low A work the plate, 45 in high A work the plate, and 45 in AA work the plate, much like the MLB area observers seeing most all of the crews as they come to their area.
 


	added below
 


	also a thought at the AAA leagues (not saying it is true, just a thought) comes to mind with the veteran call ups in the IL or PCL. if they are veterans in there home league so to speak for years, it looks like they had been shifting some of them to the opposite league after 4 years anyway, since they hardly got argued with, compared to new guys, by that home league they were in. when they had to switch leagues, the new league managers, might, be more inclined to argue with them a little more (a la aaron boone) than their old home league would have, having not seen them. and that would create more, how do you handle situations instances, than you would get if you had stayed in your same old home league forever. so the supervisors and observers evaluating in the new league got to see more of your, handling situations abilities, and other abilities since you were new. now that everyone moves through all leagues they are all seen on both coasts it sounds like, AAA on down.</description><pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2026 20:07:36 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>1st WPBL Ejection - Jemile Weeks "Watch Your Mouth"</title><link><![CDATA[https://umpire-empire.com/topic/83869-1st-wpbl-ejection-jemile-weeks-watch-your-mouth/?do=findComment&comment=453060]]></link><description>Yes, not much to see, which is what has led to all the speculation online.  
 


	I need to catch up on everything.  I've "tapped out of the world" as school has started and I was/am just burned out on a lot of things.
 


	I'm not 100% certain where their umpires are coming from.  There was an article in the early days that mentioned it was people who had worked their camps, but I'm not so certain about that.  I reached out early on for information, but never received any type of reply.
 


	Kelly Elliott Dine and the umpire in the first ejection video worked most of the season, but we have seen a few other umpires rotate in for a few games, including Sophiyia Liu (I have a picture of her I was going to post because she is wearing a very shiny +POS bucket).
 


	If you want me to say hi to her, send me your name and her name.  I would imagine the crew is here for the whole weekend.</description><pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2026 16:51:06 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>1st WPBL Ejection - Jemile Weeks "Watch Your Mouth"</title><link><![CDATA[https://umpire-empire.com/topic/83869-1st-wpbl-ejection-jemile-weeks-watch-your-mouth/?do=findComment&comment=453059]]></link><description>Very little in the video that I saw. Didn't see the thumb nor anyone getting animated (your Cardinals had some interesting stuff that Lindsay will definitely be covering though)
 


	Serendipity thank you: turns out I know the PU - and wasn't aware she was calling these games!</description><pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2026 15:50:32 +0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
