Jump to content

Remove these ads by becoming a Premium Member
Thunderheads

Force3 Defender doesn't help here....

Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, Thunderheads said:

understood.... but 8 stitches isn't a 'cut' ....  I agree it's better than a concussion no doubt, but ...why the gash?

That is rather curious....the ball obviously didn't cause it, since it clearly didn't get under the mask. Did the springs bottom out or the frame somehow hit his chin? That would be concerning. Was it a rock or some other debris? Doesn't seem likely but I guess it's possible. Or is it that the covering is so abrasive to him that the movement caused it? Perhaps the most likely scenario - but man, weird...

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Remove these ads by becoming a Premium Member
19 minutes ago, scrounge said:

That is rather curious....the ball obviously didn't cause it, since it clearly didn't get under the mask. Did the springs bottom out or the frame somehow hit his chin? That would be concerning. Was it a rock or some other debris? Doesn't seem likely but I guess it's possible. Or is it that the covering is so abrasive to him that the movement caused it? Perhaps the most likely scenario - but man, weird...

Honestly ...that's why I posted it ...I thought it was curious as well

rock or debris COULD be a source but ...not twice in 2 months ......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Boxers and MMA fighters get "compression ruptures" often, primarily above the eyes, at the cheekbones (used by Hollywood quite often, see Raging Bull, Rocky or Warrior) and on occasion on the chin when the skin there is taut. The force rebounds off the underlying bone and the skin splits, "blowing" outward. Usually, it looks like a slash wound, caused by a blade, but furls a bit, indicative of a rift (where there is an upheaval force from beneath). 

The foul-off that cut Kurt impacted right at the "wicket" (the upside-down U covering the mouth). I will not speak ill of the Defender V2, but the spring assembly is located, centerline, just below the wicket. Maybe the mask bottomed-out and Kurt had his jaw set and jutted out at the time of impact – who knows? I leave the injury repair and guesswork to my surgeon brother. But, if they're claiming it to be a gash, I'd be looking at the backside of that spring assembly.

On that note, the number of stitches doesn't necessarily imply cut or wound length. A few years ago, I got slashed on the knee by a razor-sharp snowboard edge, and while the wound length was minimal, because it was on the knee, the wound required 14 stitches to hold it closed.

@scrounge and @gnhbua93 are right, though... a shot like that on a standard mask is a home-stand / road-trip ender. I'm not claiming the speeds are the same (maybe they were, it was an MSBL game), but that sort of "pitch redirect" foul-off is what ended my Nike Steel. Caved in the primary horizontal bar and cracked the weld at the wicket. Oh, and can someone please educate Rhett Bollinger on what a "foul tip" is not???!!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, scrounge said:

That is rather curious....the ball obviously didn't cause it, since it clearly didn't get under the mask. Did the springs bottom out or the frame somehow hit his chin? That would be concerning. Was it a rock or some other debris? Doesn't seem likely but I guess it's possible. Or is it that the covering is so abrasive to him that the movement caused it? Perhaps the most likely scenario - but man, weird...

The commentators mentioned he has Moleskin padding on the inside of his mask, and that's almost suede-like in its abrasion capability. I could easily see that just being a giant "Moleskin burn."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry this is an old thread...but I think I have something I can add to the conversation. I have a Force3 mask (v1) and sometimes I get the spring at the bottom (or the spring support structure) impacting my lower chin. I think I may not be wearing the mask low enough on my face. If you look carefully at the padding down near the bottom, it is very thin just below the main chin pad, and it is only that thin part that protects your lower chin if you don't pull the mask down so your chin rests in the thick pad. I know, I think when I get hurt I am not wearing it correctly. But pulling the mask down that far seems to limit my vision through the eye opening (the upper range is my vision is partially blocked by the horizontal bar at the top of the eye opening).

Anyone else with Force3 mask notice this?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, JHSump said:

Sorry this is an old thread...but I think I have something I can add to the conversation. I have a Force3 mask (v1) and sometimes I get the spring at the bottom (or the spring support structure) impacting my lower chin. I think I may not be wearing the mask low enough on my face. If you look carefully at the padding down near the bottom, it is very thin just below the main chin pad, and it is only that thin part that protects your lower chin if you don't pull the mask down so your chin rests in the thick pad. I know, I think when I get hurt I am not wearing it correctly. But pulling the mask down that far seems to limit my vision through the eye opening (the upper range is my vision is partially blocked by the horizontal bar at the top of the eye opening).

Anyone else with Force3 mask notice this?

There is a video on YouTube by a guy named Scooter Morrison about adjusting the top pad, which would open the viewing area of the F3 (both versions).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to keep this alive, but just wanted to mention that number of stitches doesn't mean much. More stitches leaves less of a scar. I had a 7" cut after surgery on my achilles and only 8 stitches holding it closed. The doctor said I was too old to worry about glamorous ankles. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Having the springs is a good concept, I just don’t think the construction is well thought out with being held into place with screws and brackets like that. God forbid a screw or spring pops out and heads straight for an eye.

Like a lot of things in the quest for better technology, you may solve one problem, but it could create a new one. Just my 2 cents, anyway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Having the springs is a good concept, I just don’t think the construction is well thought out with being held into place with screws and brackets like that. God forbid a screw or spring pops out and heads straight for an eye.
Like a lot of things in the quest for better technology, you may solve one problem, but it could create a new one. Just my 2 cents, anyway.
Pretty sure they would have thought of that. I don't think they would release a product that had safety issues like that. If there were those issues, we would have had heard by now. I know they put Loctite on the screws because I asked them about that before I bought my mask from them.

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

    • By MadMax
      In viewing clips of pitches and hits on mlb.tv, I have noticed a trend – MLB umpires are opting to a wider variety of masks rather than the default, formerly supplied Wilson DynaLite. We’re still seeing guys use the Wilson DynAlum and the occasional Wilson Titanium (Way Too) Low Profile, and there are those still relying on their Nike Icon Titaniums, but we’re also seeing increased numbers of Mizunos, Force3 Defenders, and All-Star FM4000MAGs.
      I’m sincerely wondering when that “paradigm shift” or “break point” is going to occur, when it is open season on branding gear with attributed logos instead of hiding, obscuring, or flat-out lying so as to appease a company that lethargically refuses to progressively protect their “sponsored” representatives. Because a knocked-off mask is viewed as a “failed mask”, MLB umpires – wearing Wilson -marked masks especially – are directed to wear their masks far too tight. Well, coincidentally, this plays right into Force3’s strengths, as the reactive spring suspension functions best when the mask is worn snugly. It’s just a shame that Force3 doesn’t receive due credit!
    • By BT_Blue
      I'm looking for the shoulder paldrons for the Force3 chest protector or something else along those lines. I was inspired to try and put together my own chest protector, like the one pictured below, by a minor league umpire and Facebook friend.
      If no one has any they want to part with. Do you know if you can get "replacement" chest protector parts or ones that are not sellable on a full piece from Force3?
    • By boyinr
      Anyone out there have a Douglas with Tee Hooks and a Force 3 harness?  I ham considering sending mine in to add the tee hooks but, I don't want to make my harness obsolete.   
    • By BT_Blue
      Starting to notice guys moving away from the Big Yellow W masks to new ones. We know about Winters and Wegner going Force3 in the last year or two. And Hallion going Force3 at the end of the year. Also, famously, Hunter wearing the All Star Magnesium last year too.
      Now O'Nora is rocking the Force3, Everett (as we are all aware) getting that horrible hit with the All Star Mag, and today Jim Wolf had the All Star hollow steel in today's Indians-Mariners tilt.
      Would be interesting to see if anyone else has noticed anyone else going with a new rig this season?
    • By codizzle
      This is just a post out of sheer curiosity. I was wondering what is everyone's, current, primary mask. I'm not as interested in all your masks as there is already a thread for that ( see "Mask Porn"). I'm just curious as to the mask that you use on a regular basis. 
      I currently still use my Nike Ti on a regular basis.

×