Jump to content

Remove these ads by becoming a Premium Member


Established Member
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Everything posted by Tborze

  1. Tborze

    Catch or No Catch - Frazier Pulls a Fast One

    How did the Dodger fans not see it and rat him out?
  2. Tborze

    Is the player out

    Hijack complete
  3. Tborze

    Yet another Balk question

    Yes. Explain lead foot not touching the ground.
  4. I’ll take option 3 for $500, Johnny.
  5. Tborze

    getting help on a check swing.

    I thought about this the other day and thought about using it in my pre game, which I do on a D3k as noumpere mentioned, which seems to be an advanced mechanic for some. If it's an inevitable/obvious appeal by the catcher and you are in agreement with PU, then signal. If different, wait for the ask! JMO
  6. Tborze

    LLWS Discussion / Umpires / Plays / Etc ...

    I was told LL mechanics was that BU's don't go out, no matter how many. True? @Rich Ives?
  7. Tborze

    LLWS Discussion / Umpires / Plays / Etc ...

    Check out the thread, "mask porn", under umpire equipment I think. The throat guard shouldn't be "dangling".
  8. Tborze

    Pick off attempt

    I saw it as though he did a 180', well, would be more like a 145', because he said "continued to spin".
  9. Tborze

    LLWS Discussion / Umpires / Plays / Etc ...

    I was gonna post the same sentiments earlier! OMG, I'm not turning into Mr. Ives The reason I didn't post was, they do get 3 strikes! But I've seen batters get rung up on unhittable pitches, 2' outside. (OK, 12-14") I agree you can expand it up and down, but be consistent! What I've seen so far was NOBODY knows the strike zones! Catchers are framing EVERY pitch! The way I feel is, if you can't hit the zone, maybe you shouldn't be pitching. This IS the WS! PS; Catchers don't seem to be helping matters!
  10. Tborze

    Interference, Obstruction, or Nothing?

    I'm with you here! When I first saw it I thought OBS. Maven makes a good point of hindrance before the ball arrives, but the angle we have in the video isn't the best view for that. Maybe U2's angle was better which is why there was no INT call. Well, there was a safe call, which I assume he had nothing on the play. IMO the full speed video is the best evidence, at least from this angle. As the ball is arriving, R1 sees F4 coming in and takes a step to his left, after the ball gets by, F4's momentum carries him into R1, which tells me R1 wasn't in front of him at the time he was making a play on the ball. If F4 would have fielded it, there would be no discussion. If there was replay, I don't think either call would have been reversed. Im more curious as to what U2 said to the coach. That was a quick discussion. And how bout the announcer? The runner has his right to the base!
  11. Tborze

    U1 in 3 Man

    I like this! Would you have to trail the runner somewhat to get an angle on this without interfering with the BR?
  12. Tborze


    Good JUDGEMENT! IOW, don't call a balk if there is ANY doubt. FED I believe uses the words, "drive a runner back".
  13. Tborze

    Is Interference The Correct Call?

    Continuing to run the bases in and of itself is not INT. Unless intentional, I have 2 outs with R3 and R1/R2. I also have someone who needs to pay more attention and/or work on their mechanics.
  14. Tborze


    MR20 Inactive 0 1 post Report post Posted 57 minutes ago Hi all, the end result of this play was called Interference. Is that the correct call? With the bases loaded and one out, the batter hit a grounder to 3B. The runner from 3B scored. The third basemen fielded the ball and tug 3B for the force out on the runner from 2B (for the 2nd out) and threw the ball to 1B hoping for a double play. However, the throw to 1B was errant and the batter was safe. The runner from 1B went all the way to 3B during this time. Here is where it gets crazy. The runner who was forced out at 3B thought he was safe and ran towards home on the errant throw. The defensive team threw home and the runner was called out (again) for the final out of the inning. The defense left the field. The offensive team realized what happened and argued that the runner couldn't be called out twice. Their stance was that the play should be ruled dead and the batter, who had gone to 2B when the defense threw home, should be returned to 1B and there should still be 2 outs. After a long discussion, the umpires ruled that the runner wasn't out because he was tagged out at home (the second time he'd been called out) but he was out because of interference. That was the final out and end of the inning. Was that the correct call? I had never seen anything like it before. Thank you, Mike ^ This was posted by @MR20 and was closed and sent here. Don't know why, not the same situation, but anyway. Continuing to to run the bases is not in and of itself INT. Unless intentional, I would have 2 outs with R3, and R1/R2. Wish there was a video on this!
  15. Tborze

    U1 in 3 Man

    Depending on the situation, PU can help with INT/OBS and the throw back into 1B, right? PU can also cover his partners "assets" if U3 goes out and U1 curls outside and high-tail it to cover 2B. Free all night for that one!
  16. Tborze

    OBS at Home Plate then Malicious Contact

    Look dude, stop jumping on the bandwagon! I, along with others, obviously saw it differently than you. If you can read, nowhere did I say I wouldn't call MC because it was a title run as you so conveniently mentioned 3TIMES!! Are you questioning my judgement? So if you aren't sure, call it anyway because it's not called enough? I'm sticking with my first judgement of seeing the play IN REAL TIME without the benefit of replay and I have no problem with the call on the field!! If you feel it was MC, I have no problem with that! I wouldn't question your JUDGEMENT! I've had one MC call @ the plate in 26 yrs, and I knew it when I saw it. Are we now comparing baseball to football? I agree with it. Hell, I keep my lid on at times for protection. And obviously by keeping it on, helps to determine if there was MC or not by how far it flies off your head <ANOTHER Maybe I'm in the minority, but I don't have problems in my games! Im done with this topic! @maven give me a call. I would love to take a drive over and call a game with you! This way you will stop picking on me I love the emojis keeps me laughing so I don't get to a point where I want to
  17. Tborze

    OBS at Home Plate then Malicious Contact

    I'm not one to throw out MC's like candy at a parade. If I'm not 100% sure, I'm not dumpin a kid to lose out on 2 games, especially during a Title run. We are also not afforded the luxury of instant replays and stills, and my initial judgement on the play was from U1's perspective. I can see MC being called here. I was just being honest as to how I saw it live, which seems I wasn't the only one. I'm sure my positioning would have been a lil better though! After a collision like that, I would have gone to my partners to get their views and opinions.
  18. I would recommend keeping your mask on in this position!
  19. Tborze

    Set Position - hands below the chin

    This is not a requirement from the windup. One of our guys called three of these "technical" balks early in the season. One from the windup with R3, caused a bit of an uproar. Don't be that guy!
  20. Tborze

    NFHS Malicious Contact?????

    I'm calling Sports Science and ask them to run a test. Have 100 people run full speed for 90' and 10' from the finish line, have a 150lb punching bag pop out of the ground. I would bet all 100 would show the same actions and result as in this play. It would also be fun to watch___<so many emojis to chose from
  21. Tborze

    OBS at Home Plate then Malicious Contact

    Watch the runners helmet. But to your point, what was his helmet still doing on? Is that what they are teaching now?
  22. Tborze

    Penalty or play?

    Shouldn't the option still have been given? Or is it in MLB that you give the penalty and it's the managers job to accept the play?
  23. Tborze

    NFHS Malicious Contact?????

    Does anyone know these two teams? Is there some bitter rivalry? The reason I ask is if there may be some intentions here, possibly even by the catcher. It appears he steps into the runners path at the last second looking for the ball, but out of all the videos, clips and stills, I have not seen ONE baseball! I don't see the runner plowing into the catcher, I see the catcher getting plowed by the runner. There is a difference.