Posted 25 September 2011 - 01:52 AM
As one of the moderators of the news section, I can explain how it works.
Warren has set up literally hundreds of news feeds, each using a specific search. Most of these are placed in a queue that must be moderatored. These queued posts aren't seen until they've been approved. For an example, for every 100 or so posts, I may only approve one or two.
However, not every feed is set to go to the queue, but to be immediately posted to the group. We're working through finding them, but it's difficult to pin-point sometimes. There are feeds for every MLB umpire, different key words, and even something as simple as "umpire." If a game wrap-up story has a list of all the umpires, you're looking at 4 posts right there. Therefore, when a post is made directly to the group, it's hard for us to find the feed it's associated to.
That said: It may be counter-productive to my major role on the site, but I do agree the news feed is a bit cumbersome. The quality-to-quantity ratio is horrible. There are days that I filter through 100 news stories -- none of which are "good enough" to make a post in the feed.
However, I find it an enjoyable forum when good stories are posted. I don't think a majority of the stories that get posted would have been found by other members. The idea of the forum is to find relevant news stories, in the hopes it sparks conversation. It doesn't, though.
Andrew Senger - Webmaster,
UmpireNews.com
MSHSAA Certified Baseball Umpire
"In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king. He's also postmaster and probably traffic cop, too. All the jobs for sports referees are probably filled, though." --Lemel Hebert-Williams